So I basically called in sick today so I could lie around and read Paladin of Souls in a single quick burst, and for the first time in years I regret my departure from the List, because I'm sure someone's already done the critical essay comparing Ista to Cordelia, and I missed it and am not quite motivated enough to go try to hunt it down in the archives.
( So instead, I ramble a bit. )
Okay, Mr. Logic...
Oct. 2nd, 2004 08:51 pmI was talking to
brooklinegirl about the way Fraser tends to overanalyze and overthink things. We agreed that Fraser does this in canon and not just my fic (it just, er, takes up more screentime in my fic. shut up.) - as when he thought Thatcher wanted him to father her child. Once he'd gotten that idea, he just went along thinking it out in his own mind and never picking up further clues that might contradict his first assumption.
Fraser doesn't have problems with logic vs. instinct. After all, right there in the pilot, he acts on a hunch. Fraser has problems with logic versus reality. At some point he chooses a set of axioms, and starts proceeding - logically - from those axioms, without really fact-checking with the outside world. Unless and until the outside world starts beating him with two-by-fours, and sometimes not even then.
This lead me to the realization of what precisely Fraser's laws-of-physics-and-probability-bending superpower is: he lives In Theory. As in, "Well, Ray, In Theory it should be possible for us, if we land on precisely the right snow structures from precisely the right angle and position, to land unharmed after jumping out of a plane." And then they do!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Fraser doesn't have problems with logic vs. instinct. After all, right there in the pilot, he acts on a hunch. Fraser has problems with logic versus reality. At some point he chooses a set of axioms, and starts proceeding - logically - from those axioms, without really fact-checking with the outside world. Unless and until the outside world starts beating him with two-by-fours, and sometimes not even then.
This lead me to the realization of what precisely Fraser's laws-of-physics-and-probability-bending superpower is: he lives In Theory. As in, "Well, Ray, In Theory it should be possible for us, if we land on precisely the right snow structures from precisely the right angle and position, to land unharmed after jumping out of a plane." And then they do!
Due South continuity thoughts
Sep. 24th, 2004 08:01 amOne of the many people on my flist who's just recently gotten hold of DS season three on DVD remarked recently that she was a bit puzzled by the way "Asylum" - an episode vaunted for the increased closeness between Fraser and Kowalski - was immediately followed by "Mountie on the Bounty" - a two-part episode whose B-plot is quite firmly centered around whether or not the Fraser-Kowalski partnership is going to break up.
I just rewatched "Asylum" last night, and I have to say: it makes perfect sense to me. You just have to remember that, like Buffy said, it's about power.
( Who's got it, and who doesn't. )
So, yeah. There's my spot of episode-analysis for the year.
I just rewatched "Asylum" last night, and I have to say: it makes perfect sense to me. You just have to remember that, like Buffy said, it's about power.
So, yeah. There's my spot of episode-analysis for the year.
(no subject)
Jun. 10th, 2004 01:01 pmHey, look, almost a week since my last post. I've been, um, really busy - actually doing work at work more often than not, and busting out eight thousand words on the hockey AU since Friday. Too bad I'm not actually getting any closer to the end.
Anyway, the other day I managed to wrench my brain free of the hockeyhockeyhockey (It was, seriously, about three minutes. I was making ramen.) for long enough to have a thought about Joe Dick
( and some massive Hard Core Logo movie-spoilerishness ).
But I dunno; maybe my brain is getting all mooshy from malnutrition - I understand ramen will do that. Whaddya think?
Anyway, the other day I managed to wrench my brain free of the hockeyhockeyhockey (It was, seriously, about three minutes. I was making ramen.) for long enough to have a thought about Joe Dick
But I dunno; maybe my brain is getting all mooshy from malnutrition - I understand ramen will do that. Whaddya think?
(no subject)
Jun. 4th, 2004 08:20 amA link from
fairmer to a mass interview of Lois McMaster Bujold, Patricia Wrede, Pamela Dean, Peg Kerr, Eleanor Arnason, Lyda Morehouse, and Caroline Stevermer, here. Includes fun stuff like a discussion of the appeal of h/c slash!
Also, for my fellow intitiates in the Sisterhood of Perpetual Homoerotica: we are not alone. Over in England, hunters are trying to start the Free Church of Country Sports. Link found via Neil Gaiman's blog - actually that whole entry is worth a look, since it starts out with him finally explaining to his daughter that "You were named after a drag queen in a Lou Reed song."
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Also, for my fellow intitiates in the Sisterhood of Perpetual Homoerotica: we are not alone. Over in England, hunters are trying to start the Free Church of Country Sports. Link found via Neil Gaiman's blog - actually that whole entry is worth a look, since it starts out with him finally explaining to his daughter that "You were named after a drag queen in a Lou Reed song."
Dude, therapy is the coolest thing ever.
Jun. 2nd, 2004 01:32 pmA) It's apparently still free,
B) I got an evening appointment for next time, so I will actually get to eat lunch on my lunch break all five days next week, no bus-car-car-bus adventures required, and
C) K cracks my shit up.
( I think she gets it. )
B) I got an evening appointment for next time, so I will actually get to eat lunch on my lunch break all five days next week, no bus-car-car-bus adventures required, and
C) K cracks my shit up.
I Am Not A Monofan
Apr. 28th, 2004 10:30 amSo I'm sitting here, with Napoleon and Illya on my desktop, the Headstones on my headphones (thanks
brooklinegirl! I'm holding you and/or Hugh responsible if I'm snarly all day...), noodling the hockey AU and poking around the LJ end of the Band of Brothers slash fandom.
Okay, about that last one.
The main LJ community for it appears to be
camp_toccoa, and it seems to be a very cool community indeed, and there is a web archive and everything. I haven't yet managed to wrap my brain around it sufficiently to read any fic (WWII soldiers and hockey players being, apparently, the only real people who kick my RPS-flinch) but I was poking around the user info and found the following in the userinfo, as part of the submission guidelines:
If you're posting an RPS story, please, put it behind an LJ-cut and attach a clear warning for those who don't care for this genre.
And all I can think is, the fuck? I mean, for starters, this is a clearly labeled slash community in a whole fandom based on (granted, slightly fictionalized on HBO) real people - two posts back in the community journal, somebody's pimping a magazine profile of the men of Easy Company, so people can pick up details on the guys for fanfic. And secondly, if they're not counting fic about the guys in the HBO miniseries as RPS, on the grounds that they're fictional characters who just so happen to be based on real people, who on earth would they be writing real RPS about? Is there BoB actorslash out there?
And why the hell does the thought of Ron Livingston/Damian Lewis slash bother me less than the thought of Nixon/Winters?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Okay, about that last one.
The main LJ community for it appears to be
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
If you're posting an RPS story, please, put it behind an LJ-cut and attach a clear warning for those who don't care for this genre.
And all I can think is, the fuck? I mean, for starters, this is a clearly labeled slash community in a whole fandom based on (granted, slightly fictionalized on HBO) real people - two posts back in the community journal, somebody's pimping a magazine profile of the men of Easy Company, so people can pick up details on the guys for fanfic. And secondly, if they're not counting fic about the guys in the HBO miniseries as RPS, on the grounds that they're fictional characters who just so happen to be based on real people, who on earth would they be writing real RPS about? Is there BoB actorslash out there?
And why the hell does the thought of Ron Livingston/Damian Lewis slash bother me less than the thought of Nixon/Winters?
I was going to say something, but this lovely Daniel icon from
daughtershade has driven it completely out of my mind.
Oh. I think it was 'Why can I cheerfully write and read D/s relationships for vampires (e.g. Angel/Spike) but not humans (e.g. Harry/Draco or, on the not-writing side, Muir/Bishop from Spy Game)?' As far as I can tell, the answer is "You expect vamps to be more fucked up than humans," but that's sort of philosophically unsatisfying.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Oh. I think it was 'Why can I cheerfully write and read D/s relationships for vampires (e.g. Angel/Spike) but not humans (e.g. Harry/Draco or, on the not-writing side, Muir/Bishop from Spy Game)?' As far as I can tell, the answer is "You expect vamps to be more fucked up than humans," but that's sort of philosophically unsatisfying.
A few things
Feb. 11th, 2004 08:23 amFirst, an earthshattering announcement. Please note yesterday's date on your calendars:
iuliamentis and I, for no compelling reason, didn't watch any Stargate. We will, of course, attempt to remedy the situation tonight.
Anyway. Finally managed to settle on a pleasing Stargate-themed wallpaper for my work computer: this from jackslashdaniel.com, which manages to betray my thing for incredibly depressing country music and my Daniel Thing, all in one go. Yay me. Incidentally, does anybody know of a Stargate vid (or Sarah-McLachlan-like profusion of vids) to "The Dance"? Because, yes.
( And now, the SG rambling )
And it occurs to me that this whole ramble could well be superceded by any one of the ~40 episodes I haven't seen yet, in which case, ah, well. I'm a n00b.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Anyway. Finally managed to settle on a pleasing Stargate-themed wallpaper for my work computer: this from jackslashdaniel.com, which manages to betray my thing for incredibly depressing country music and my Daniel Thing, all in one go. Yay me. Incidentally, does anybody know of a Stargate vid (or Sarah-McLachlan-like profusion of vids) to "The Dance"? Because, yes.
And it occurs to me that this whole ramble could well be superceded by any one of the ~40 episodes I haven't seen yet, in which case, ah, well. I'm a n00b.
hoppy legs and twitchy little noses.
Jan. 15th, 2004 07:33 pmI think there's a reason we call them bunnies. I think it's because of their kinship to the Velveteen Rabbit.
They first show up, eyes dewy and bright, fur soft and addictively pettable, with button noses and cottony tails, and of course we want to play with them. And they want us to play with them, because that's the only way they'll ever become Real. We have to believe in them hard enough and long enough, and in the process rub off half their fur and lose one eye and unravel half their stitching... After a while they're looking pretty mangy, but, if we're lucky, by then we're so attached to our darling bunnies that we keep on anyway, playing and playing with them, sharing them out with a trusted friend or two, crying over them and flinging them at the wall but always gathering them up and apologizing and jamming the bits of stuffing back inside the rents, until - poof - one day we open our hands and they spring away from us, whole and alive and Real.
Unless, of course, just when the bunny's gone a bit funny looking and developed an odd smell, when the ribbon's gotten tatty and one eye is loose and the stitching fragile, so you're a bit afraid to play with it as vigorously as you once did, you're distracted by other toys, other concerns, and then one day you come home and there, sitting on top of the toy chest, is a brand new rabbit, with a shiny ribbon tied round its neck and dewy eyes and a button nose and its fur is soooo soft and clean and you just can't stop playing with it. Maybe you feel a twinge of guilt - maybe more than a twinge - when you look at the poor manky old bunny sitting next to the toy chest, and several more when you think of all the other bunnies in various states of disrepair, jammed into the trunk and under the bed and on the shelf at the top of the closet. But there's a new bunny, now, and you're a shallow bastard when you come down to it.
Or maybe that's just me.
Which is to say, Jesus Tap-Dancing Christ, I needed another post-CotW angst-epic like I needed a hole in my head. And I'm sorry.
They first show up, eyes dewy and bright, fur soft and addictively pettable, with button noses and cottony tails, and of course we want to play with them. And they want us to play with them, because that's the only way they'll ever become Real. We have to believe in them hard enough and long enough, and in the process rub off half their fur and lose one eye and unravel half their stitching... After a while they're looking pretty mangy, but, if we're lucky, by then we're so attached to our darling bunnies that we keep on anyway, playing and playing with them, sharing them out with a trusted friend or two, crying over them and flinging them at the wall but always gathering them up and apologizing and jamming the bits of stuffing back inside the rents, until - poof - one day we open our hands and they spring away from us, whole and alive and Real.
Unless, of course, just when the bunny's gone a bit funny looking and developed an odd smell, when the ribbon's gotten tatty and one eye is loose and the stitching fragile, so you're a bit afraid to play with it as vigorously as you once did, you're distracted by other toys, other concerns, and then one day you come home and there, sitting on top of the toy chest, is a brand new rabbit, with a shiny ribbon tied round its neck and dewy eyes and a button nose and its fur is soooo soft and clean and you just can't stop playing with it. Maybe you feel a twinge of guilt - maybe more than a twinge - when you look at the poor manky old bunny sitting next to the toy chest, and several more when you think of all the other bunnies in various states of disrepair, jammed into the trunk and under the bed and on the shelf at the top of the closet. But there's a new bunny, now, and you're a shallow bastard when you come down to it.
Or maybe that's just me.
Which is to say, Jesus Tap-Dancing Christ, I needed another post-CotW angst-epic like I needed a hole in my head. And I'm sorry.
(no subject)
Dec. 16th, 2003 11:44 am![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
For me, all I can say is, oh. yes.
(no subject)
Nov. 21st, 2003 04:25 pm![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
#128114 +(1622)- [X]
Which cracks my shit up. I'd send it on to #4 Brother, except he's probably already seen it. In fact, he probably wrote it or submitted it or something.
Whaddya think,
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Why do you read slash?
Nov. 9th, 2003 02:01 amI know everybody's taken at least one survey about why they read slash, and tried to pin it down for themselves, probably as an ongoing question. Gender roles, relationship dynamics, on and on.
That's not what I want to know. I want to know, what got you hooked? Did a particular person pimp you in? What story made you say Yeah, this is what I want?
( My answers, if you're curious... )
So there you go. That's why I read slash. What about you?
That's not what I want to know. I want to know, what got you hooked? Did a particular person pimp you in? What story made you say Yeah, this is what I want?
So there you go. That's why I read slash. What about you?
some stuff
Oct. 18th, 2003 03:40 amI have all these thoughts, and keep forgetting to post them. And as I may well be spending a lot of tomorrow drinking, I might as well toss out what I can remember now.
( Fic Peeve )
And I'd been meaning to ask this at
ds_discourse but I'm too lazy to post twice.
Is it ever canonically established which set of grandparents Fraser grew up with? Fic seems to point unanimously to his paternal grandparents, but I'd never really been able to see Bob as the child of librarians. Also, I always thought he was significantly older than Caroline (itself probably a baseless assumption) and the odds were therefore better on her parents still being alive than his - I can see Bob coming from a long line of Mounties, dying in the traces like his father before him (though hopefully not his son and daughter after him - good long lives for Ben and Maggie, please). And if Ben was raised by his Fraser grandparents, where the hell were the Pinsents?
With apologies if this is all established in one of those Vecchio-era episodes that I swear I am going to get around to watching sooner or later.
And I'd been meaning to ask this at
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
Is it ever canonically established which set of grandparents Fraser grew up with? Fic seems to point unanimously to his paternal grandparents, but I'd never really been able to see Bob as the child of librarians. Also, I always thought he was significantly older than Caroline (itself probably a baseless assumption) and the odds were therefore better on her parents still being alive than his - I can see Bob coming from a long line of Mounties, dying in the traces like his father before him (though hopefully not his son and daughter after him - good long lives for Ben and Maggie, please). And if Ben was raised by his Fraser grandparents, where the hell were the Pinsents?
With apologies if this is all established in one of those Vecchio-era episodes that I swear I am going to get around to watching sooner or later.
A completely unmotivated observation.
Oct. 14th, 2003 04:43 amSo it's late and I'm maybe just slightly cranky, and I'm feeling a momentary disaffection for slash.
The thing about it is, even though it's all transgressive and whatnot, because it messes with gender roles and the nature of sexuality and all, it still supports the status quo in a certain sense. Because slash goes out of its way to say that the relationship which matters most to you in all the world has got to be a sexual one. Despite the fact that there's no canonical evidence of a sexual relationship between the characters (just. just *shove* the subtext for a second, I know there's subtext, that doesn't *mean* anything.) we insist that there has to be one, or ought to be one, based on the intensity and exclusivity of feeling between them.
But the truth is, statistically speaking, they're probably straight. They're probably friends. Not *just* friends, because Ray would take a bullet for Fraser and Fraser would drown himself rather than leave Ray behind in a sinking ship and they're riding off into the sunrise together, eschewing all other relationships (aside from Dief, of course) to be together, because nothing else matters nearly as much. But you know what? They're probably not having sex.
And I know why slash says they do: because nobody wants to read that story, where they live the rest of their lives in a two-bedroom apartment, hooking up with strangers for sex when they need it, crawling into each other's beds when they really want company, never quite enough for each other, but taking up too much of each other's hearts to give anyone else a fair shake. Because slash is, at heart, romance, and romances ought to end happily most of the time and that means the difficulties have to be resolved, and they have to both miraculously turn out to be at least a little gay, and whatever.
But in the real world, it wouldn't work like that. Y'know?
The thing about it is, even though it's all transgressive and whatnot, because it messes with gender roles and the nature of sexuality and all, it still supports the status quo in a certain sense. Because slash goes out of its way to say that the relationship which matters most to you in all the world has got to be a sexual one. Despite the fact that there's no canonical evidence of a sexual relationship between the characters (just. just *shove* the subtext for a second, I know there's subtext, that doesn't *mean* anything.) we insist that there has to be one, or ought to be one, based on the intensity and exclusivity of feeling between them.
But the truth is, statistically speaking, they're probably straight. They're probably friends. Not *just* friends, because Ray would take a bullet for Fraser and Fraser would drown himself rather than leave Ray behind in a sinking ship and they're riding off into the sunrise together, eschewing all other relationships (aside from Dief, of course) to be together, because nothing else matters nearly as much. But you know what? They're probably not having sex.
And I know why slash says they do: because nobody wants to read that story, where they live the rest of their lives in a two-bedroom apartment, hooking up with strangers for sex when they need it, crawling into each other's beds when they really want company, never quite enough for each other, but taking up too much of each other's hearts to give anyone else a fair shake. Because slash is, at heart, romance, and romances ought to end happily most of the time and that means the difficulties have to be resolved, and they have to both miraculously turn out to be at least a little gay, and whatever.
But in the real world, it wouldn't work like that. Y'know?
RayK and the Q-word.
Oct. 8th, 2003 06:33 pmIt's possible that I'm just lexically hypersensitive, but has anybody else noticed that Ray says "queer"? I can only recall one instance right now - it might well have been the only one - but in "Eclipse," when he notices something hinky about the coffin that's been brought in, he says "Something's queer." It's not a common usage anymore - outside of people who've been reading a lot of Tolkien or Frances Hodgson Burnett - and, dammit, I want to be able to explain this without reference to the writers (although, hey, what's going on *there*?).
( So let's see... )
The other instance where "queer" pops up is in "The Ladies' Man" - Ray is fumbling to explain to Beth why he's here, and Beth, who is, admittedly, kinda crazy at this point, interrupts him with, "I'm here? Because I'm here? Because I'm queer?" Hard to say whether Beth is talking about herself in the first two 'I'm here's, and the third one, well, who knows. Ray's response ("Kinda nutty, huh.") gives no sign of responding to the word "queer" in any case, no matter who he thinks it's being applied to, though, again, he seems to take it in its uninflected sense, to mean 'strange', which is some kind of seriously willful misreading, because "I'm here, I'm queer" is not to be understood in that sense. (And what's the traditional end to that line, anyway? "I'm/we're not going anywhere?" Apropos...)
And, um, I'm going to stop before I actually attempt to write an essay based on two occurrences of a given monosyllable in a character's twenty-two episode run, because, yes.
The other instance where "queer" pops up is in "The Ladies' Man" - Ray is fumbling to explain to Beth why he's here, and Beth, who is, admittedly, kinda crazy at this point, interrupts him with, "I'm here? Because I'm here? Because I'm queer?" Hard to say whether Beth is talking about herself in the first two 'I'm here's, and the third one, well, who knows. Ray's response ("Kinda nutty, huh.") gives no sign of responding to the word "queer" in any case, no matter who he thinks it's being applied to, though, again, he seems to take it in its uninflected sense, to mean 'strange', which is some kind of seriously willful misreading, because "I'm here, I'm queer" is not to be understood in that sense. (And what's the traditional end to that line, anyway? "I'm/we're not going anywhere?" Apropos...)
And, um, I'm going to stop before I actually attempt to write an essay based on two occurrences of a given monosyllable in a character's twenty-two episode run, because, yes.
betraying my ignorance.
Sep. 7th, 2003 01:17 amI (like probably a lot of you) always read a lot as a kid, way above my grade level, and I could never be bothered to actually look things up, so I learned a lot of words by context. Now, older and having discovered the joy of dictionaries, I find myself periodically wondering what exactly equanimity or recidivist or viz means, and I go look it up.
Unfortunately, I can't do this in that case, so I just have to ask: What, exactly, does woobie mean?
Unfortunately, I can't do this in that case, so I just have to ask: What, exactly, does woobie mean?
Okay, very fast now!
Aug. 25th, 2003 08:42 pmLibrary computers close in about ten minutes, so let's see what I can say before then...
We're supposed to have DSL today and, perhaps obviously, we don't. And neither I nor either of my roommates is willing to call SBC and ask them why not. I think this makes us pathetic.
Before I forget:
( about Billy, Joe, and money )
And, bugger, there's the three-minute warning, so the dream about Fraser wearing nothing but the serge and a strategically-placed tape dispenser (okay, actually that's all I remember) will just have to wait...
We're supposed to have DSL today and, perhaps obviously, we don't. And neither I nor either of my roommates is willing to call SBC and ask them why not. I think this makes us pathetic.
Before I forget:
And, bugger, there's the three-minute warning, so the dream about Fraser wearing nothing but the serge and a strategically-placed tape dispenser (okay, actually that's all I remember) will just have to wait...
(no subject)
Aug. 1st, 2003 01:05 amHave I mentioned that I love #3 Brother to little tiny loveable pieces? I do. I was all bored and fidgety and useless tonight, and when I IMed him, he was too, so he came right over and we watched Hard Core Logo - my fifth time (and second in twenty-four hours - I can's seem to watch it just once) and his first.
( And that means I'm finally qualified to talk about the movie... )
And does anybody know if there's an actual proper soundtrack to this movie, other than the tribute album? Because I would want that - not just the HCL stuff, but all the incidental music, and Hugh and Callum doing "Waking Up Tired." Mmmmmmhm.
And does anybody know if there's an actual proper soundtrack to this movie, other than the tribute album? Because I would want that - not just the HCL stuff, but all the incidental music, and Hugh and Callum doing "Waking Up Tired." Mmmmmmhm.